Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:33
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Mya Lesnar, daughter to WWE legend Brock Lesnar, wins national title in shot put - ESPN
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why does NASA's Perseverance rover keep taking pictures of this maze on Mars? - Space
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Scientists Just Solved a 14,000-Year-Old Puppy Mystery - Gizmodo
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Grandfather's simple changes reversed pre-diabetes diagnosis that left him 'petrified' - AOL.com
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What have I done wrong? How can I start over?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Person arrested after security threat at Sea-Tac, flights halted - MyNorthwest.com